58th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (EBES)
Eurasia Business and Economics Society (EBES) · in person / online · Official site ↗
Trust
Legitimate. Long history and real committee; small gaps, e.g. next year's fees not out yet.
Real but small or regional, little verified indexing. Fine for networking and a2/a3 points.
- !Double blind — States 'double blind reviewing process', but decisions come within a week of submission (57th abstract-submission page)
- !Indexing verified — Springer series is in Scopus, but only selected papers; CPCI claim stops at the 34th
- !Known mill — 4-5 events a year and one-week abstract decisions, but not a mill
- ✓Archive history — Springer proceedings volumes since the 10th conference
- ✓Committee international — Multinational society committee
- ✓Committee listed — Scientific committee page exists
- ✓Domain age — Society active since 2008
- ✓Indexing specific — Names a specific Springer series and journals
- ✓Organizer reputable — Academic society with SSCI journals
- ✓Past editions — 57 editions since 2009
✕Failed !Warning ?Not verified ✓Passed
Promotion (NN 42/2026)
0.0 points per paper (≤ 4 authors)
- — Abstracts only: no full paper in proceedings, so it doesn't count as a scientific paper.
- — Proceedings papers can supply at most 1/3 of the required minimum points.
- — Max 1 paper per author per proceedings volume.
Deadlines & fees
- Abstract
- 07-12-2026
- Full paper
- TBA
- Notification
- TBA
- Registration
- TBA
| coauthor | regular | €300 | · 57th Prague: online co-author; extra paper EUR 200 |
| coauthor | regular | €400 | · 57th Prague: in-person co-author |
| presenter | regular | €350 | · 57th Prague: online presenter |
| presenter | regular | €500 | · 57th Prague: in-person presenter |
Indexing
What is trust?
Trust is ANA's verdict on whether a conference is a real scientific event rather than a fee-collecting mill. It says nothing about prestige or promotion points; those are shown separately.
| Established | 9–10 | Major society or long-running conference. Indexing and committee verified. |
| Trusted | 7–8 | Legitimate. Long history and real committee; small gaps, e.g. next year's fees not out yet. |
| Plausible | 5–6 | Probably legitimate, but key claims (indexing, review, committee) are only partly verified. |
| Doubtful | 3–4 | Several checks failed or couldn't be verified. Check it yourself before submitting. |
| Avoid | 1–2 | Matches a known conference mill or has serious red flags. |
How it's scored: every conference starts at 3. Points are added for a listed committee, an international committee, 3+ past editions, a domain and archive several years old, and a university or society organiser. Points are taken off for vague indexing ("major databases"), an indexing claim that turns out false, review faster than 7 days, a brand-new domain, missing committees, or many unrelated conferences on one site. A known conference mill is capped at 2.
Quality is a separate 1–5 score for whether it's worth presenting there: the conference's tier (flagship, mid, regional), verified WoS/Scopus indexing, double-blind review, a reputable organiser and an international committee. A small regional conference can be fully trusted and still Modest.
| Top | 5/5 | Flagship conference: verified indexing or a major society, rigorous review. |
| High | 4/5 | Strong international conference with solid review and a reputable host. |
| Mid | 3/5 | Good conference, but indexing or review rigour only partly verified. |
| Modest | 2/5 | Real but small or regional, little verified indexing. Fine for networking and a2/a3 points. |
| Low | 1/5 | Real, but little evidence of selectivity or reach. |
Joint with the Youssef Nabih Department of Accounting, Onsi Sawiris School of Business, American University in Cairo. Days 1-2 are hybrid in person; day 3 is online only. Abstract decisions come 'within a week of submission'. Fees are copied from the 57th (Prague 2026), since the Cairo fees are not published. Co-authors can attend at a lower fee (listener_allowed refers to that).