46th International Conference on Organizational Science Development (FOV)
University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences · in person · Official site ↗
Trust
Major society or long-running conference. Indexing and committee verified.
Real but small or regional, little verified indexing. Fine for networking and a2/a3 points.
- !Double blind — Peer review described, double-blind not stated.
- ✓Archive history — Archive editions online.
- ✓Committee international — 13 of 39 members from abroad.
- ✓Committee listed — 39 members, 13 from abroad; spot-check OK.
- ✓Domain age — University domain.
- ✓Indexing specific — Names UM Press, DOAB, OAPEN; no WoS/Scopus claim.
- ✓Known mill — University-run.
- ✓Organizer reputable — Public university.
- ✓Past editions — 46th edition.
✕Failed !Warning ?Not verified ✓Passed
Promotion (NN 42/2026)
0.75 points per paper (≤ 4 authors)
- — International committee from 6 countries: a2.
- — Proceedings papers can supply at most 1/3 of the required minimum points.
- — Max 1 paper per author per proceedings volume.
Deadlines & fees
- Abstract
- 12-12-2026
- Full paper
- 23-01-2027
- Notification
- TBA
- Registration
- TBA
| listener | regular | €378 | · assumed participant fee |
| presenter | early | €378 | · 2026 value, €310 + VAT |
| presenter | regular | €427 | · 2026 value, €350 + VAT |
Indexing
What is trust?
Trust is ANA's verdict on whether a conference is a real scientific event rather than a fee-collecting mill. It says nothing about prestige or promotion points; those are shown separately.
| Established | 9–10 | Major society or long-running conference. Indexing and committee verified. |
| Trusted | 7–8 | Legitimate. Long history and real committee; small gaps, e.g. next year's fees not out yet. |
| Plausible | 5–6 | Probably legitimate, but key claims (indexing, review, committee) are only partly verified. |
| Doubtful | 3–4 | Several checks failed or couldn't be verified. Check it yourself before submitting. |
| Avoid | 1–2 | Matches a known conference mill or has serious red flags. |
How it's scored: every conference starts at 3. Points are added for a listed committee, an international committee, 3+ past editions, a domain and archive several years old, and a university or society organiser. Points are taken off for vague indexing ("major databases"), an indexing claim that turns out false, review faster than 7 days, a brand-new domain, missing committees, or many unrelated conferences on one site. A known conference mill is capped at 2.
Quality is a separate 1–5 score for whether it's worth presenting there: the conference's tier (flagship, mid, regional), verified WoS/Scopus indexing, double-blind review, a reputable organiser and an international committee. A small regional conference can be fully trusted and still Modest.
| Top | 5/5 | Flagship conference: verified indexing or a major society, rigorous review. |
| High | 4/5 | Strong international conference with solid review and a reputable host. |
| Mid | 3/5 | Good conference, but indexing or review rigour only partly verified. |
| Modest | 2/5 | Real but small or regional, little verified indexing. Fine for networking and a2/a3 points. |
| Low | 1/5 | Real, but little evidence of selectivity or reach. |
Theme: The Future of Work and Contemporary Organizational Challenges. Explicit HRM and OB sections. Deadlines are last year's, expect similar.